John Steele Gordon has a great piece on the differences between government and business, which gives seven reasons why government can't run a business. It's a brilliant summary of the public vs. private sector contrast that is the heart and soul of this blog. Well worth reading.
I have two favorites. First, government is a monopoly, and virtually never faces competition, thus voiding the most powerful force driving capitalism toward greater efficiency. Second, Government is regulated by government:
When "postalization" of the nation's phone system appeared imminent in 1917, Theodore Vail, the president of AT&T, admitted that his company was, effectively, a monopoly. But he noted that "all monopolies should be regulated. Government ownership would be an unregulated monopoly."
It is government's job to make and enforce the rules that allow a civilized society to flourish. But it has a dismal record of regulating itself.
It is government's job to make and enforce the rules that allow a civilized society to flourish. But it has a dismal record of regulating itself.
Another great tidbit from this piece, for which I couldn't find the source:
In 1913, for instance, thinking it was being overcharged by the steel companies for armor plate for warships, the federal government decided to build its own plant. It estimated that a plant with a 10,000-ton annual capacity could produce armor plate for only 70% of what the steel companies charged. When the plant was finally finished, however -- three years after World War I had ended -- it was millions over budget and able to produce armor plate only at twice what the steel companies charged. It produced one batch and then shut down, never to reopen.
it's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my research.
Posted by: Dissertation Writing | February 26, 2010 at 05:13 PM